Skip to content
Give
← All Reviews
WHERE TO WATCH
MOVIE REVIEW

THE LOST WORLD: JURASSIC PARK

Jurassic Park becomes King Kong in a magnificent, violent thrill ride.

1997PG-13134 minutesUniversal PicturesHorror
Worth the trip — middle school and up.
ENTERTAINMENT QUALITY ★★★★ 3 / 4 Magnificent visuals and superb action direction.
FAMILY CONTENT Discernment −1 on the +4 to −4 scale Discernment: fine for middle schoolers and up; parents should decide carefully for younger children because the violence is over the top.
CONTENT LEVELS NONE → HEAVY
Language Light
Violence Heavy
Sex None
Nudity None
BEST FOR Middle schoolers, teens, and adults who can handle intense dinosaur violence.
NOT FOR Younger children or viewers troubled by graphic monster attacks.
CONTENT IN ONE LINE Dinosaur attacks, threats, and deaths; 3 profanities; and a scientific-materialist, pagan environmentalist worldview.
SHARE f 𝕏 ✉ ⧉

Should You Watch It?

The answer depends on what you want from a sequel. The Lost World: Jurassic Park is a great thrill ride, with gigantic special effects, magnificent visuals, and action directed with Steven Spielberg’s customary skill. The dinosaurs create a primal fear that remains entertaining, especially when the film turns into a modern, more sophisticated King Kong.

But the movie’s moral center is thin. Human characters are underdeveloped, and dozens of deaths receive few consequences, as though the victims were cartoon figures rather than people with families, hopes, and careers. The film also offers no real hope of redemption from the murderous chaos it depicts.

If your family includes middle schoolers or older viewers who can handle over-the-top dinosaur violence, this is worth the trip; younger children should stay home.

The Story

NO SPOILERS — WE KEEP THE SURPRISES

Dr. Ian Malcolm returns to the islands of Jurassic Park when he learns that his girlfriend, Dr. Sarah Harding, is already there documenting dinosaur behavior. What begins as a rescue mission becomes more complicated when a team of hunters arrives to capture a T. Rex and bring it to America for public display.

As the naturalists and hunters pursue competing goals, the dinosaurs become an increasingly powerful threat. The danger eventually reaches beyond the isolated island.

Is It Any Good?

Three stars means this is a strong, entertaining production with meaningful weaknesses. Visually, The Lost World is magnificent. Spielberg directs the successive dinosaur threats and attacks superbly, while special-effects manager Stan Winston demonstrates mastery of his craft. David Koepp’s action screenplay makes the story more complex and interesting than Jurassic Park.

The film’s main weakness is that its human characters are underdeveloped. They seem to exist mainly as fodder for the dinosaurs’ appetites, which diminishes the emotional weight of the deaths. Because the first film already depicted dinosaur attacks, this sequel’s appeal is also diminished.

The Worldview

The Lost World presents a scientific-materialist worldview in which humans meddle with nature, nature retaliates, and no redemption follows. Its moral prescription is limited to Hammond’s environmentalist appeal to leave the animals alone on their island. The film offers no corresponding hope for either human beings or dinosaurs caught in the resulting violence.

The movie’s environmental concern has a recognizable truth: human beings should not treat living creatures as mere commercial products. Yet the film’s pagan environmentalist framework gives creation no biblical redeemer. Man is set against nature, and man loses, but the story does not point beyond that conflict.

Scripture gives a larger hope. Creation is not merely trapped in an endless cycle of death and predation; “the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the sons of God” (Romans 8:19). God promises redemption from death and decay, not simply retreat from the natural world.

Movieguide® worldview codes: Pa, E, L, VVV, M — preserved for our database, awards research and the annual Report to the Entertainment Industry. What the codes mean →

The Content Guide

The specifics — spoilers included by nature — so you can judge for your own family.

Content Summary

Pagan environmentalist worldview; 3 profanities; and, excessive violence as dinosaurs attack, threaten & eat humans, dinosaur smashes man beneath its paw, dinosaur smashes a bus & stoplight, ship crashes into dock, man fights man, & men fight dinosaurs.

Talk About It

Questions for the drive home, the dinner table, or the youth group.

01

The film presents nature as powerful but offers little hope beyond leaving it alone. What does Scripture say about humanity’s responsibility toward creation—and about creation’s future redemption?

Genesis 1:26–28 · Romans 8:19–21
02

The human victims are treated almost like cartoon characters. Why does the Bible insist that every person has lasting value?

Genesis 1:27 · Psalm 139:13–16
03

Hammond changes from exploiting dinosaurs to protecting them. What does genuine repentance involve beyond changing a public policy?

2 Corinthians 7:10 · Luke 3:8
04

The dinosaurs’ attacks create fear and fascination. How can fear shape our choices, and where does Scripture direct us when we are afraid?

Psalm 56:3–4 · 2 Timothy 1:7

The Final Word

The Lost World: Jurassic Park delivers magnificent visuals and superb dinosaur action, but its human characters are thin and its worldview offers no redemption. For viewers middle school age and up who can handle over-the-top violence, it is WORTH THE TRIP — MIDDLE SCHOOL AND UP. For younger children, choose something gentler.

THE VERDICT Worth the trip — middle school and up.
WHERE TO WATCH Planning family movie night instead? Start with this week’s family-friendly picks →

More Movies Like This

Browse All Reviews →