CHILDREN OF THE REVOLUTION
A funny, offbeat Communist satire meant for intellectual adults.
Should You Watch It?
This is a strange, intelligent comedy built around blind political faith. Judy Davis plays Joan Fraser, an Australian Communist whose devotion to Josef Stalin drives her from workers’ demonstrations to Moscow and back again. The result is an offbeat story that treats Communism tongue-in-cheek while ultimately showing its futility.
The film is funniest in its first two-thirds, especially in its mockumentary style and political absurdity. It is less successful when the story turns melodramatic around a political uprising, family conflict, and questions of identity. The film also includes adult content that keeps it away from family viewing.
If you enjoy intellectually oriented political comedy and can handle the content, it is worth an adult watch; families with children should choose something else.
The Story
NO SPOILERS — WE KEEP THE SURPRISESIn 1940s Australia, Joan Fraser is determined to make her country Communist. She organizes a workers’ revolution, writes to Josef Stalin, and remains devoted to him as Australia grows more democratic.
When Joan is invited to Moscow to meet Stalin, an Australian spy becomes involved in her journey. What follows changes Joan’s life, her marriage, and the future of the son she raises.
Is It Any Good?
Three stars means this is a good but uneven film. It is intelligent, funny, and unusual, with a mockumentary approach reminiscent of Strictly Ballroom and This Is Spinal Tap. Much of the humor comes from the contrast between Communist idealism and the movement’s historical failure.
The first two-thirds provide most of the laughs. The fictional political uprising is more entertaining than the events surrounding the uprising itself. Later, the film becomes melodramatic, and the marital troubles and identity conflict weaken the comedy. One sexual fantasy is more frightening than funny.
The Worldview
The film centers on blind faith in Communism. Joan’s devotion is passionate and idealistic, but the story places that devotion against the movement’s failure. Its “red black comedy” approach lightly endorses Communist ideas for comic effect while finally demonstrating their futility.
The movie also treats capitalism with suspicion through Joan’s wariness of fast food and bad television. Stalin is presented as a confused, lonely womanizer rather than as a brutal dictator, which softens the historical reality of the Communist leader. The result is a political satire that mocks zealotry but does not offer a fully developed biblical alternative.
The film’s central warning is that passionate commitment to a failed ideology cannot make it true. Scripture urges believers to test what they believe rather than follow blind devotion: “Test everything; hold fast what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21).
The Content Guide
The specifics — spoilers included by nature — so you can judge for your own family.
Content Summary
Communist worldview with anti-Communist elements & ending; 27 obscenities & 6 profanities; mild violence such as fighting, rioting, demonstrations, & brief shooting incident; implied fornication & briefly depicted marital intercourse; rear male nudity; alcohol use; smoking; and, lying themes & purposefully breaking the law
Talk About It
Questions for the drive home, the dinner table, or the youth group.
Joan’s political devotion becomes a form of blind faith. How can we examine our convictions honestly instead of following a crowd or ideology?
1 Thessalonians 5:21 · Acts 17:11The film presents Communism as passionate but ultimately futile. What makes an idea attractive, and how can we recognize when an idea conflicts with truth?
John 8:31–32 · Colossians 2:8Joan and the people around her use deception and deliberately break laws. When, if ever, should Christians resist human authority, and what responsibilities remain when they do?
Romans 13:1–7 · Acts 5:29The Final Word
This small Australian comedy is intelligent, funny, and unusual, even if its later melodrama cannot match its sharp opening. Its political satire ultimately exposes the futility of Communism, but its adult content makes the audience clear: WORTH THE TRIP — ADULTS ONLY. For family-friendly alternatives, see.