MICKEY 17
A clever sci-fi premise buried under a hateful anti-Christian sermon.
Should You Watch It?
Bong Joon Ho can clearly make an exciting, weird, funny science-fiction movie — the bones of a good one are here. A man who dies and gets reprinted into a new clone every time is a genuinely fun premise, and the film has fun with it.
But the movie isn't content to entertain. It builds its villain — the leader of the whole colonizing expedition — as a disgraced, bombastic Christian politician clearly modeled on Donald Trump, and plays him so broadly that the satire curdles into contempt. The result attacks capitalism and Christians alike, wraps that attack in abundant f-words, strong violence, and lewd content, and asks you to laugh along.
That's a lot to ask of a Christian viewer, and it's not a fair trade for the fun parts. Skip it.
The Story
NO SPOILERS — WE KEEP THE SURPRISESMickey Barnes is broke, in debt to a loan shark, and out of options on Earth. So he signs up for a colonizing expedition to a distant ice planet — without reading the fine print. He's just become an "expendable": every time a deadly task kills him, his mind and memories are downloaded into a freshly cloned body. Leading the expedition is Kenneth Marshall, a disgraced, bombastic politician and religious fanatic who sounds a lot like a certain former U.S. president. That's where we'll leave it.
Is It Any Good?
Three stars means real craft with real problems. The premise is inventive, and the film is often exciting, comical, and weird in the fun sense — Bong Joon Ho knows how to build a strange world and keep it moving.
The trouble is the villain. Mark Ruffalo plays the Christian politician so over-the-top — complete with a hammy Trump impression and scenes of pseudo-Christian hymn-singing — that he becomes a cartoon rather than a threat. A story that wants you to take it seriously shouldn't make its main antagonist this clownish; it undercuts the film's own credibility. Add abundant profanity that reads as a substitute for sharper writing, and you get a movie whose imagination outpaces its script.
The Worldview
This is a humanist, implied-Marxist film with a strongly politically correct edge, and it makes Christianity one of its primary targets. The head villain is a failed, corrupt Christian politician-businessman leading his own followers to a new planet — a portrait built specifically to indict religious and capitalist power at once. The film does contain redemptive threads: a sacrificial death, a hero who repeatedly gives himself up for others, and a plea for compassion and truth toward an intelligent alien species. But even these gestures live inside the film's humanist frame, not a biblical one — the story's version of martyrdom pairs self-sacrifice with the villain's death in the same act, which is closer to a very different tradition of "martyrdom" than to the self-giving love Christ modeled.
The politician-villain is written and played as a deliberate echo of a real, still-living political figure, right down to his speech patterns. That choice trades persuasive argument for caricature, and it's worth naming as a conviction about the filmmaking, not a verdict on any person.
Underneath the satire is a real longing — for a leader worth following, and for sacrifice that actually means something. Scripture answers both: "Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends" (John 15:13) — a love this film gestures toward but never quite reaches.
The Content Guide
The specifics — spoilers included by nature — so you can judge for your own family.
Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements
Very strong humanist, implied Marxist but very strongly politically correct, worldview in a science fiction story with very strong anti-Christian, anti-capitalist elements where the head villain is a failed Christian politician (his stupidity lost his re-election campaign according to a line form the movie) and businessman who’s leading some of his followers and other people to establish a colony on another planet (the actor playing the Christian politician does a hammy Donald Trump impression to go along with the movie’s depiction of a corrupt, tyrannical Christian, capitalist politician), plus some light and brief homosexual allusions in one short sequence, and the movie has some redemptive, moral elements such as a sacrificial death by one character, title character makes sacrifices for the colonial expedition, movie promotes compassion and truth (but within its humanist, politically correct worldview), and good guys try to make peace with an indigenous intelligent alien species of bug-looking creatures
Foul Language
About 91 obscenities (including about 48 “f” words), four GD profanities (most if not all said by the Christian villain), 11 light profanities, one or two obscene gestures, and a few instances of vomiting when a character gets fatally sick or is deliberately poisoned
Violence
A few instances of very strong violence such as an astronaut walking in space gets his hand torn off while people inside a spaceship eat next to a window looking out into space as the hand floats by, a shot of bloody hands implies a character has slit their wrists, and man ingests a deadly virus on a planet and later vomits blood against the window of a medical observation capsule, and lots of strong action violence and perilous situations such as some physical fighting, clones repeatedly die, would be assassin points a gun at political leader, but the bullet hits a large builder brought back from a planet’s surface, a little bug creature comes out of the boulder later and many people panic, soldiers fire weapons at creature but miss, people dangle above an incineration hole with fire at the bottom a creature with a hook in it, man is poisoned and gets sick but survives after vomiting, a large explosion occurs, small but scary intelligent bug creatures are led by a large intelligent but scary bug creature that seems to be their mother, [SPOILERS] people are frightened by the creatures but they are benevolent unless threatened, the mother bug creature demands a death when one of her children is killed, creatures gather around human facility and threaten total annihilation of the humans while the evil leader of the humans wants to spread a gas that will kill all the bug creatures (there’s kind of a stalemate at the end of the movie), evil human leader’s wife cuts off and cuts up a little bug creature’s tail and mixes it in a blender to see if it will make a tasty sauce, a large droplet of blood may be a person’s blood to be used for cloning, and a man is ordered to shoot himself in the head, but he doesn’t
Sex
Briefly depicted fornication in one scene after kissing/hugging and after briefly implied fornication in another scene, scenes imply that a cloned man’s clone is fornicating with the cloned man’s girlfriend after the cloned man survives a deadly situation, implied oral sex in one image, stock figures on a computer screen imply sexual positions, and it’s briefly suggested that the two identical male clones can engage in sex, but the suggestion is rejected
Nudity
Upper male nudity
Alcohol Use
No alcohol use
Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse
No smoking content, but man buys and uses oxycontin, and there are references to another man selling the drug to people on a spaceship and at a colony facility on an ice planet;
Miscellaneous Immorality
Loan shark has two men kidnapped and threatened (one scene depicts them tied up and gagged), movie has a politically correct subtext about immigrants potentially mistreating an indigenous group of beings (this seems to fit in with the movie’s Marxist, humanist, politically correct worldview), and lying and manipulation.
Talk About It
Questions for the drive home, the dinner table, or the youth group.
The film gives its hero a kind of "sacrifice" that comes bundled with a villain's death — is that the same thing as the sacrifice Christ calls His followers to?
John 15:13 · Romans 5:8Mickey signs a contract he never reads. What does Scripture say about the cost of hasty commitments and the wisdom of counting the cost first?
Luke 14:28 · Proverbs 4:26The movie's villain is a corrupt religious leader used to indict Christianity as a whole. How should Christians respond when public failures of faith leaders are used to paint the whole faith?
1 Peter 2:12 · Titus 2:7–8The humans and the alien species nearly destroy each other out of fear before considering peace. What does the Bible say about how we're meant to treat those who are different from us or without power?
Micah 6:8 · Luke 10:25–37The Final Word
Bong Joon Ho had a genuinely fun sci-fi premise here, and you can see it in flashes. But the finished film spends its runtime mocking Christian faith through a clownish villain, wrapping that message in abundant profanity, strong violence, and sexual content. Our answer stands: skip it. For a family movie night that won't leave you defending the film to your kids, start with our latest.