Skip to content
Give
← All Reviews
WHERE TO WATCH
MOVIE REVIEW

GEORGE OF THE JUNGLE

A lightweight jungle parody with too much crude humor for a family outing.

1997PG91 minutesWalt Disney Pictures/Walt Disney Company/Buena Vista DistributionRomantic Comedy
Wait for home.
ENTERTAINMENT QUALITY ★★★★ 3 / 4 Funny moments, but lacking originality.
FAMILY CONTENT Discernment −1 on the +4 to −4 scale Discernment advised; fine for middle schoolers and up, while parents should decide for younger children.
CONTENT LEVELS NONE → HEAVY
Language Moderate
Violence Moderate
Sex Moderate
Nudity Light
BEST FOR Families with middle-schoolers and older viewers who enjoy broad parody.
NOT FOR Families seeking clean, consistently silly humor or a movie with the charm of the cartoon series.
CONTENT IN ONE LINE Scatological and sexual humor, foul language, and a lackluster approach that is better controlled at home.
SHARE f 𝕏 ✉ ⧉

Should You Watch It?

George of the Jungle has a promising setup and occasional laughs. Brendan Fraser nearly succeeds at pretending to be a cartoon, Leslie Mann has her moments, and John Cleese is consistently good as Ape. The film also offers an affectionate romantic adventure built around George, Ursula, and their animal friends.

But the movie is too often banal, scatological, or sexual. The review specifically questions why a family movie contains so much foul language. It also lacks the wonderful silly humor of the cartoon series and the grandeur of The Jungle Book, becoming a too-earnest B movie without enough vision or originality to captivate audiences.

You may find enough light entertainment here, but the crude material and uneven humor make a theater trip hard to recommend. Wait for home, where you can decide whether it suits your family.

The Story

NO SPOILERS — WE KEEP THE SURPRISES

George was raised by animals in Africa after a childhood plane crash. Years later, wealthy heiress Ursula Stanhope arrives on safari, hoping to find the legendary great white ape.

George rescues Ursula after a mock jungle attack, drawing the attention of her betrothed, Lyle Van De Groot. When danger comes to George’s animal friends, George and Ursula must leave the jungle world behind and face Lyle’s schemes.

Is It Any Good?

Three stars means this is a watchable movie with some appealing performances, but not a particularly inspired one. Brendan Fraser almost succeeds in playing George like a living cartoon. Leslie Mann has her moments, and John Cleese is consistently good as Ape.

The film has funny moments, but its humor is too often banal, scatological, or sexual. It is also much too earnest in its attempt at comedy. Compared with the cartoon series, it lacks wonderful silly humor; compared with The Jungle Book, it lacks grandeur. The result is a B movie without the vision and originality to captivate audiences.

The Worldview

The film intentionally parodies the “noble savage” tradition represented by Tarzan and Mowgli. George’s life among animals is treated as the foundation for a romantic adventure, while civilized society is often mocked through Lyle’s condescending behavior and Ursula’s parents’ disgust that George is not their class.

The story also presents romance as a powerful longing. Ursula leaves behind the expectations surrounding her engagement and becomes drawn to George and his jungle world. The movie’s romantic worldview is played for comedy rather than explored with much depth, and its sexual humor makes that romance less wholesome than it might have been.

The film’s central movement is toward love, belonging, and a new family. Scripture says, “He who finds a wife finds a good thing and obtains favor from the LORD” (Proverbs 18:22).

Movieguide® worldview codes: Ro, LL, VV, SS, N, A, D — preserved for our database, awards research and the annual Report to the Entertainment Industry. What the codes mean →

The Content Guide

The specifics — spoilers included by nature — so you can judge for your own family.

Content Summary

Parody of a romantic worldview; 6 obscenities & 5 profanities; slapstick violence including pratfalls, blows to the groin, childish torture, & lots of running into trees with no blood; frequent sexual innuendo & sexual humor including bestiality; loin cloths & upper male nudity; alcohol use; and, smoking

Talk About It

Questions for the drive home, the dinner table, or the youth group.

01

George is shaped by the animals who raised him, while Ursula comes from a wealthy family. How should we think about people whose backgrounds are very different from our own?

James 2:1–4 · 1 Samuel 16:7
02

The movie uses romance and sexual humor for laughs. How can you recognize when a joke treats something important in an unhelpful way?

Ephesians 5:3–4 · Philippians 4:8
03

Lyle’s condescending behavior affects how others see him. What does Scripture teach about humility and the way we treat people?

Philippians 2:3–4 · Proverbs 16:18
04

George’s animal friends are central to the story. What responsibilities has God given people toward the world He made?

Genesis 1:26–28 · Proverbs 12:10

The Final Word

George of the Jungle has a few funny performances and a light romantic adventure, but its crude humor and foul language undercut its family appeal. Save it for home, where you can use your own discernment about younger viewers. WAIT FOR HOME. For a cleaner family movie night, start here:

THE VERDICT Wait for home.
WHERE TO WATCH Planning family movie night instead? Start with this week’s family-friendly picks →

More Movies Like This

Browse All Reviews →

Family-Friendly Alternatives